IMPS vs NEFT vs RTGS: Everything You Need to Know

By
Tarun Nazare
24 Sep
5 Mins

You’ve finally found your dream home!

Everything is finalized and you’re all set to close the deal. The only thing left is transferring the down payment to the seller.

You pick up your phone to make the payment. But, with so many bank transfer methods available, you need to choose one that ensures the funds are transferred swiftly and securely. Should you choose IMPS, NEFT, or RTGS?

While all three methods allow you to transfer money electronically, they have key differences. Understanding these can be crucial, especially when time is of the essence, and you want to avoid any payment delays.

By the end of this blog, you’ll know exactly which method to use—whether you're transferring money to a seller, paying a friend, or covering school fees. Ready to dive in?

What are NEFT, IMPS, and RTGS?

NEFT, IMPS, and RTGS are all methods to electronically transfer money from one account to another.

Think of them as different modes of transportation—sometimes you need a slow route, other times something faster, or even immediate. Each method offers its own pace and purpose for transferring funds. 

National Electronic Funds Transfer (NEFT)

NEFT is a one-to-one transfer system operated by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) since 2005. 

It allows money transfers across India, but the transactions are processed in batches at regular intervals, meaning it’s not instant.

Immediate Payment Service (IMPS)

IMPS, launched by the National Payment Corporation of India (NPCI) in 2010, is perfect for real-time transfers. The funds are credited to the beneficiary’s account instantly, making it the fastest option available.

Real-Time Gross Settlement (RTGS)

RTGS is designed for high-value transactions that require immediate clearance. Unlike NEFT, which operates in batches, RTGS transfers money immediately on a gross basis. This means the funds reach the recipient’s account within minutes.

Difference Between NEFT, IMPS, and RTGS

Now that we’ve got an idea of each of these payment methods, let’s compare them so that you can easily decide which one to use in which situations.

Feature NEFT IMPS RTGS
Owned and Operated by RBI NPCI RBI
Minimum Transfer Amount Rs. 1 Rs. 1 Rs. 2 lakh
Maximum Transfer Amount No limit Rs. 5 lakh No limit
Type of Settlement In batches One-to-one settlement One-to-one settlement
Fund Transfer Speed Slow to Moderate; the processing time for NEFT can take up to 2 hours Instant (real-time) Instant (real-time)
Transaction Charges No charges for inward transactions and online transactions

For other transactions (via bank branch transfer/ via non-savings account):

Varies from Rs. 2.5 to Rs. 25 based on the transfer amount

Decided by the individual member banks and PPIs.

Varies from Rs. 2.5 to Rs. 25 based on the transfer amount + GST taxes

No charges for inward transactions and online transactions

For outward transactions:

Rs. 2 lakh – Rs. 5 lakh: Up to Rs.25

Above Rs. 5 lakh: Up to Rs. 50

  • GST taxes
Service Availability Online & Offline Online Online & Offline
Modes of Payment Internet Banking
Mobile Banking
Bank Branch Transfer
Internet Banking
Mobile Banking
Internet Banking
Mobile Banking
Bank Branch Transfer
Timings NEFT Online - 24/7, 365 days
Bank branch transfer - bank hours only
IMPS Online - 24/7, 365 days RTGS Online - 24/7, 365 days
Bank branch transfer - bank hours only

How to Choose Between IMPS, NEFT, and RTGS?

The best method for you depends on factors like fund transfer speed, transaction limits, and convenience. Here’s a breakdown to help you decide:

Transaction Speed

  • NEFT: Processes transactions in batches, taking up to a few hours for the funds to reflect in the recipient’s account.
  • IMPS & RTGS: Offer instant transfers, with funds reaching the recipient in real time.

Fund Transfer Limits

  • NEFT: No minimum or maximum limit, though some banks set their own limits.
  • IMPS: Maximum limit of Rs. 5 lakhs per transaction. 
  • RTGS: Minimum limit of Rs. 2 lakh per transaction, with no upper limit (depends on bank policies).

Charges

While digital transfers are more affordable and reliable, they aren't always free. Here are the charges applicable: 

NEFT Charges

Since July 1, 2019, the RBI has eliminated processing fees for NEFT transactions charged to banks. Additionally, starting from January 1, 2020, the RBI mandated that no fees be charged for NEFT online transactions made from savings accounts. The RBI has also waived charges for inward transactions at destination bank branches, ensuring that transferring funds to beneficiary accounts remains free of cost.

If you're doing an outward transaction in other ways (like at the bank branch or through a non-savings account), there could be some minimal fees involved:

  • Less than or equal to Rs. 10,000: Rs. 2.5 + GST
  • Between Rs. 10,000 and Rs. 1 Lakh: Rs. 5 + GST
  • Between Rs. 1 Lakh and Rs. 2 Lakh: Rs. 15 + GST
  • Equal to or more than Rs. 2 Lakh: Rs. 25 + GST

IMPS Charges

IMPS charges vary from bank to bank and are largely subject to the amount transferred. The regular IMPS charges range from Rs. 2.5 to Rs. 25 for amounts up to Rs. 5 lakhs. 

  • Less than or equal to Rs. 10,000: Rs. 2.5 + GST
  • Between Rs. 10,000 and Rs. 1 Lakh: Rs. 5 + GST
  • Between Rs. 1 Lakh and Rs. 2 Lakh: Rs. 15 + GST
  • Between Rs. 1 Lakh and Rs. 5 Lakh: Rs. 25 + GST

Here’s a look at the IMPS charges for some of the major banks in the country:

Bank Charges (Exclusive of GST)
ICICI Bank Rs. 3.50 to Rs. 15.00
HDFC Bank Rs. 3.50 to Rs. 15.00
State Bank of India No charges
Kotak Mahindra Bank No charges
Axis Bank Rs. 2.50 to Rs. 10.00
Canara Bank Rs. 5.00 – Rs. 18.00

*These charges are subject to change

RTGS Charges

With effect from July 01, 2019, RBI has waived the processing charges for RTGS transactions for the recipient, but banks can charge a service fee for outward transactions. To ensure banks charge a fair and reasonable fee to transfer money, RBI has mandated a general set of guidelines:

  1. Inward transactions: Free, no charge to be levied.
  2. Outward transactions: some text
    • Rs. 2,00,000 to Rs. 5,00,000: Rs. 25 or less + GST 
    • Above Rs. 5,00,000: Rs. 50 or less + GST

Banks can choose to charge a lower rate, but they can't charge more than the RBI's limit.

Network Compatibility

NEFT, IMPS, and RTGS transactions can be processed only between the banks that offer the respective services.

For example, you cannot RTGS to a bank that offers only NEFT services. For an RTGS transfer, both the sending and receiving bank need to be RTGS-enabled. Each bank needs to be a part of the respective system for you to be able to use it to transfer money. Before making a transfer, it's always good to check if both the sender’s and recipient's banks support the service you plan to use.

Safety and Security

All three transfer methods—NEFT, IMPS, and RTGS—are highly secure and reliable. They use robust encryption protocols to protect your money and information.

However, it’s always recommended to double-check the recipient’s details before confirming a transaction as incorrect information could lead to delays or even fund loss. 

NEFT, RTGS, and IMPS - Which is Better? 

At the end of the day, it’s all about your needs. NEFT is perfect for not-so-rush situations. It’s cost-effective and reliable for routine payments like rent, moving money between your own accounts, or making payments that are not urgent. As long as the recipient doesn’t need the funds “right at this second”, NEFT is a solid choice.

On the other hand, IMPS will be your go-to option when you need to transfer money quickly. Whether it’s an emergency bill, paying for something on-the-spot or making time-sensitive payments, IMPS makes sure that the money gets to the recipient immediately.

RTGS is best for transferring large sums of money, widely used for business transactions, real estate purchases, or in any situation where speed and security are important, and a large amount is involved.

Wrapping Up

So, the next time you are in a situation to send money, you’ll know exactly which option to choose. NEFT for no-rush transfers, IMPS for instant money transfers, and RTGS when you’re moving huge amounts!

As digital transactions continue to evolve, businesses are turning to advanced solutions like virtual account numbers (VANs) to simplify their financial processes. Neokred’s Virtual Account Number is an innovative tool that allows businesses to streamline payments by offering unique account identifiers for each customer or transaction, reducing the risk of errors and improving reconciliation.

If you're looking to enhance your transaction management, explore Neokred. It's a smart step towards more efficient, secure, and organized financial operations.

Conclusion

FAQs

How many times can we use NEFT, IMPS, and RTGS in a day?

These services can be availed 24x7. There’s no limit to the number of transactions that can be done in a day.

What happens if the money is transferred to the wrong bank account?

The sender has to inform the bank to take immediate action. If the account number doesn’t exist, the money will be reverted to the sender’s account automatically.

Which payment method is faster: IMPS, NEFT, or RTGS?

IMPS is the fastest option for money transfers, as it processes transactions instantly. RTGS is also quick, with transactions typically completed within minutes.

Can IMPS, NEFT, and RTGS transactions be reversed or canceled?

No, once a transaction is processed, it cannot be reversed or canceled.

Is there a minimum transaction amount for IMPS, NEFT, and RTGS per day?

NEFT and IMPS have no minimum amount, but RTGS is meant to be used for transactions above Rs. 2 lakh.

Verified
Build Frictionless
Customer Journeys
Get Started

Related Posts

View All
5 Mins

GDPR vs DPDPA: What Indian Businesses Need to Know

GDPR vs DPDPA: What Indian Businesses Need to Know  

Introduction

With the enforcement of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA) in India, businesses are facing a major shift in how they handle user data. While many are already familiar with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) from the European Union, the Indian DPDPA brings a localized set of expectations that require careful alignment.

If your business operates online, handles user data, or targets customers in India, understanding the similarities and differences between GDPR and DPDPA is crucial to avoid non-compliance penalties and maintain user trust.

What Is GDPR and What Is DPDPA?

GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) is a comprehensive data privacy regulation that governs the use of personal data of EU citizens. Enforced since 2018, it applies to any organisation inside or outside Europe that processes EU user data.

DPDPA (Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023) is India’s data protection law designed to address the digital privacy needs of Indian citizens. While inspired by GDPR, it focuses on Indian legal, social, and operational contexts.

Key Similarities

Both regulations are built on similar privacy principles such as lawful and fair data processing, data minimization, purpose limitation, and user consent. They also emphasize the importance of transparency, giving users access to their data, and ensuring organisations implement strong data security measures.

Important Differences Between GDPR and DPDPA

Despite similarities, there are critical differences businesses must understand:

  • Scope and Applicability: GDPR applies globally to any entity handling EU citizen data, while DPDPA primarily applies to entities processing digital personal data of Indian citizens.
  • Consent: Both require clear and informed consent, but DPDPA introduces the concept of “deemed consent” allowing processing in certain legitimate contexts without explicit permission, such as for employment or public interest.
  • Age of Consent: GDPR sets the age of consent at 16 (with member states allowed to lower it to 13), whereas DPDPA fixes it at 18 across the board.
  • Regulatory Authority: GDPR is enforced by individual Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) in each EU country. DPDPA will be enforced centrally by the Data Protection Board of India.
  • Cross-Border Transfers: GDPR permits data transfers to countries with “adequate” privacy protections. DPDPA allows transfers to countries notified by the Indian government a more discretionary mechanism.
  • Penalties: GDPR can fine up to €20 million or 4% of global turnover. DPDPA fines can go up to ₹250 crore, making it one of the strictest regimes in the APAC region.
  • Data Subject Rights: GDPR grants broad rights including data portability and objection to processing. DPDPA offers rights like access, correction, erasure, and grievance redressal with some differences in implementation detail.

Why GDPR-Compliant Doesn’t Mean DPDPA-Compliant

Many businesses assume that GDPR compliance gives them automatic coverage under DPDPA. But DPDPA’s specific provisions like deemed consent, age requirements, and regional enforcement require a separate layer of localization.

Compliance with GDPR is a strong foundation, but not a full solution for Indian legal obligations.

How Blutic Helps You Navigate Both

Blutic is built to handle both GDPR and DPDPA compliance through a unified, region-aware platform. It helps businesses:

  • Show location-based cookie consent banners
  • Categorize cookies clearly with opt-in controls
  • Record and store user preferences with timestamps
  • Offer granular consent management for specific data purposes
  • Integrate with tools like Google Tag Manager, Shopify, and WordPress
  • Maintain consent logs for audit readiness

Whether you're an Indian business expanding to Europe or a global company entering India, Blutic ensures you're compliant, user-friendly, and future-proof.

India’s DPDPA reflects a maturing digital landscape, demanding accountability from businesses handling personal data. While it borrows foundational elements from GDPR, it introduces its own framework and enforcement style. Understanding these differences and acting early is the key to risk-free, trust-centric operations.

Blutic helps Indian businesses confidently navigate this evolving space by simplifying compliance without compromising user experience.

5 Mins

How Fintechs Can Reduce KYC Onboarding Drop-Off Caused by Form Fatigue

Why KYC Onboarding Still Struggles to Convert

In fintech onboarding, intent is rarely the issue. Users begin the journey willing to complete identity verification, yet a significant number never reach the end. Industry-wide, KYC and identity verification stages consistently see the highest abandonment especially when users are required to manually enter the same information multiple times across forms and document uploads. User patience hasn’t decreased. Expectations have increased.

The Cost of Form Fatigue in Fintech Onboarding

Repetitive onboarding flows introduce friction at the most sensitive stage of the user journey.

This typically shows up as:

  • Long forms asking for identity and address details  
  • Document uploads that repeat already-entered information  
  • Multiple steps validating the same data  

Each repetition adds effort. Each added step increases the likelihood of drop-off.

For businesses, this friction results in:

  • Higher acquisition costs with lower activation rates  
  • Delayed customer onboarding  
  • Increased operational effort to follow up on incomplete applications  

Form fatigue affects both conversion and efficiency.

Why This Problem Exists Across the Industry

Many onboarding systems were designed around verification completeness, not user effort minimisation.

As a result:

  • Data capture and verification operate as separate stages  
  • Document uploads don’t meaningfully reduce form length  
  • Users are asked to provide the same information in different formats  

When verification workflows are layered on top of forms instead of integrated into them, redundancy becomes visible—and frustrating.

What Efficient Onboarding Looks Like

Effective onboarding follows a simple principle:
Do not ask users to manually enter information that already exists in a verifiable form.

Instead:

  • Verified data is reused within the onboarding flow  
  • Forms are shortened wherever possible  
  • Users confirm details rather than re-enter them  

This keeps onboarding focused on validation, not repetition.

How ProfileX Supports This Approach

ProfileX, built by Neokred, supports onboarding flows where verified data is used to reduce unnecessary manual input.

ProfileX enables:

  • Real-time verification of identity and address  
  • Support for both individual (KYC) and business (KYB) onboarding  
  • Validation of company registrations, tax IDs, licenses, and regulatory documents  

The emphasis is on reducing redundant user effort while maintaining structured verification processes.

Automation Without Disrupting the User Journey

ProfileX supports automated KYC and KYB processes through configurable workflows that reduce manual intervention.

This helps:

  • Maintain onboarding continuity  
  • Limit repeated user actions  
  • Keep the experience consistent across channels  

Automation is applied to simplify the flow not to add complexity.

Fraud and Risk Signals During Onboarding

Onboarding is also a critical point for early risk detection.

ProfileX includes fraud and risk signaling using device intelligence, which:

  • Analyses device behaviour during user interaction  
  • Identifies anomalies such as emulators, bots, or tampered devices  
  • Detects multiple accounts associated with the same device  

These signals integrate into existing risk workflows and operate without interrupting genuine users.

Reducing Drop-Off Starts with Removing Repetition

Onboarding failures are rarely caused by lack of intent. They are more often caused by users being asked to repeat themselves.

By shortening forms, reusing verified data, and integrating verification directly into the flow, fintechs can reduce onboarding drop-offs without weakening compliance requirements.

What to Review in Your Onboarding Flow

If drop-offs consistently occur midway through onboarding, it’s usually a process signal.

Look for:

  • Fields users have already provided elsewhere  
  • Uploads that don’t reduce manual effort  
  • Steps that validate the same data twice  

That’s where friction starts and where improvement has the most impact.

5 Mins

Why Soundbox Devices Are Becoming Essential for Indian Merchants

Why Soundbox Devices Are Becoming Essential for Indian Merchants

India’s digital payments scale has exposed a gap that software alone cannot solve: real-time, unambiguous payment confirmation at the physical point of sale. Soundbox devices have emerged not as accessories, but as operational infrastructure for merchants handling high-frequency UPI transactions.

The Real Problem Soundboxes Solve: Payment Ambiguity at Scale

UPI works exceptionally well at the system level. The friction appears at the merchant execution layer.

In busy retail environments, merchants deal with:

  • Simultaneous customers
  • Multiple payment apps
  • Network latency or delayed app notifications
  • Human error during verification

The result is payment ambiguity situations where a customer claims success, but the merchant cannot instantly verify receipt. Soundbox devices eliminate this ambiguity by becoming a single source of truth at the counter.

Why Smartphone-Based Verification Fails in Real-World Conditions

Most merchant apps assume ideal conditions: one device, one transaction, one operator. Indian retail rarely works this way.

Operational limitations include:

  • Shared phones across staff
  • Battery drain and device downtime
  • Notification overload
  • App switching delays during peak hours

Soundboxes offload payment confirmation from smartphones to dedicated hardware, improving reliability without adding complexity.

Impact on Transaction Throughput and Queue Economics

In high-volume environments, even a 2–3 second delay per transaction compounds quickly.

Soundbox devices:

  • Remove the need for manual checks
  • Enable continuous transaction flow
  • Reduce verbal confirmation loops with customers

For merchants processing hundreds of payments daily, this translates to:

  • Shorter queues
  • Higher throughput
  • Better staff productivity

This operational efficiency directly affects revenue during peak periods.

Dispute Reduction and Operational Risk Control

UPI disputes are rarely about fraud they are about timing, visibility, and confirmation.

Soundbox devices help reduce:

  • “Paid but not received” arguments
  • Accidental double payments
  • Missed transactions during rush hours

By announcing only confirmed credits, soundboxes introduce determinism into an otherwise probabilistic verification process.

Trust Signaling in Semi-Formal Retail Environments

In many Indian retail settings, trust is built in real time.

Audio confirmation:

  • Signals transaction success to both parties
  • Reduces dependency on visual proof
  • Reinforces merchant legitimacy

This is particularly important in:

  • Cash-heavy neighborhoods
  • First-time digital payment users
  • Tier-2 and tier-3 markets

Soundboxes quietly reinforce confidence in digital payments without requiring user education.

Integration with POS, QR, and Merchant Workflows

Modern soundbox deployments are no longer standalone.

They are increasingly:

  • Linked to dynamic QR systems
  • Integrated with POS terminals
  • Synced with merchant dashboards and settlement systems

This integration ensures consistency across:

  • Payment modes
  • Transaction records
  • End-of-day reconciliation

Soundboxes are becoming part of a cohesive merchant payments stack, not an isolated device.

Uptime, Connectivity, and Hardware Dependability

In payments, reliability is not a feature — it is a baseline requirement.

Soundbox devices are designed for:

  • Continuous power availability
  • Low-bandwidth connectivity
  • Always-on operation

This makes them more dependable than consumer smartphones in retail environments, especially during long operating hours.

Soundboxes as Enablers of Merchant Digitization

Beyond confirmation, soundbox adoption has second-order effects:

  • Encourages full digital acceptance
  • Reduces cash handling
  • Creates cleaner transaction records
  • Supports future credit and analytics use cases

For small merchants, soundboxes act as a gateway device into structured digital commerce.

Strategic Importance in India’s Payment Infrastructure

India’s payment growth is not constrained by consumer adoption it is constrained by merchant-side execution.

Soundbox devices solve a uniquely Indian problem:

  • Extremely high UPI volume
  • Highly fragmented merchant base
  • Real-world retail constraints

This is why soundboxes have moved from optional add-ons to core infrastructure.

Soundbox devices are not about convenience. They are about clarity, speed, and operational certainty at the moment money changes hands.

For Indian merchants operating at scale, soundboxes are no longer a nice-to-have — they are becoming essential to running digital-first commerce reliably.

Ready to take your customer experience and product to next level with Neokred